Publication details
Acquisition of object-robbing and object/food-bartering behaviours: a culturally maintained token economy in free-ranging long-tailed macaques
2021

Jean‐Baptiste Leca; Noëlle Gunst; Matthew Gardiner, and others

2021
Headline

The free‑ranging long‑tailed macaques at Bali’s Uluwatu Temple spontaneously barter stolen objects for food, providing an ecologically valid example of a culturally maintained token economy in non‑human primates.

Highlights

The token exchange paradigm shows that monkeys and great apes are able to use objects as symbolic tools to request specific food rewards

Around the Uluwatu Temple in Bali, Indonesia, a large free-ranging population of long-tailed macaques spontaneously and routinely engage in token-mediated bartering interactions with humans. These interactions occur in two phases: after stealing inedible and more or less valuable objects from humans, the macaques appear to use them as tokens, by returning them to humans in exchange for food

Synopsis
Summary

Snapshot

The free‑ranging long‑tailed macaques at Bali’s Uluwatu Temple spontaneously barter stolen objects for food, providing an ecologically valid example of a culturally maintained token economy in non‑human primates.

Key findings

Age influences success in both stealing and bartering, reflecting learned competence.

Monkeys adjust their acceptance of food rewards based on the value of the token they possess, demonstrating economic decision‑making.

The observed practice is cross‑generational, socially transmitted, and may represent a culturally maintained token economy.

The token exchange paradigm shows that monkeys and great apes are able to use objects as symbolic tools to request specific food rewards

Around the Uluwatu Temple in Bali, Indonesia, a large free-ranging population of long-tailed macaques spontaneously and routinely engage in token-mediated bartering interactions with humans. These interactions occur in two phases: after stealing inedible and more or less valuable objects from humans, the macaques appear to use them as tokens, by returning them to humans in exchange for food

Objectives

The study aimed to develop a more ecologically valid primate model of trading systems that can inform our understanding of human economic behaviour.

Methods

Researchers combined field observations with experimental manipulations to document the two‑phase token‑mediated bartering process: macaques first stole inedible objects of varying value and then returned them to humans in exchange for food.

Results

Field data revealed (i) age‑related differences in robbing and bartering success, indicating experiential learning, and (ii) strong behavioural links between the perceived value of tokens and the quantity or quality of food rewards that subadult and adult monkeys accepted or rejected, suggesting payoff maximisation.

Conclusions

The spontaneous token‑bartering behaviour of these macaques provides a naturalistic model of economic exchange, highlighting that complex trade‑like interactions can arise and be culturally sustained in free‑living animal societies.

Key terms

Long-tailed macaque

Token economy

Cultural transmission

Kleptoparasitism

Barter

Animal cognition

Primate

Behavioral economics

Free-ranging animal

Social learning

Dig deeper

Explore original text

Abstract Main Text References
Study features
Snapshot methods
Snapshot results
Snapshot conclusions

Limitations

The study is confined to a single macaque population at one temple site, limiting generalisability across species or habitats.

Observational and experimental data were gathered in a human‑altered environment, which may influence the naturalness of the behaviour.

Future work

Further research should compare token‑exchange behaviours across different primate groups and ecological contexts, and investigate the mechanisms of cultural transmission that sustain the token economy.

Practical applications

Understanding naturally occurring token economies in primates can inform models of human economic behaviour, aid in designing more ecologically valid experimental paradigms, and contribute to conservation strategies that consider human‑wildlife economic interactions.

Comparative analysis
Detail
Spotlight
Important contexts
Contributions
Important points

The token exchange paradigm shows that monkeys

These interactions occur in two phases

the macaques appear to use them as tokens

Key concepts
Abstract
The token exchange paradigm shows that monkeys and great apes are able to use objects as symbolic tools to request specific food rewards. Such studies provide insights into the cognitive underpinnings of economic behaviour in non-human primates. However, the ecological validity of these laboratory-based experimental situations tends to be limited. Our field research aims to address the need for a more ecologically valid primate model of trading systems in humans. Around the Uluwatu Temple in Bali, Indonesia, a large free-ranging population of long-tailed macaques spontaneously and routinely engage in token-mediated bartering interactions with humans. These interactions occur in two phases: after stealing inedible and more or less valuable objects from humans, the macaques appear to use them as tokens, by returning them to humans in exchange for food. Our field observational and experimental data showed (i) age differences in robbing/bartering success, indicative of experiential learning, and (ii) clear behavioural associations between value-based token possession and quantity or quality of food rewards rejected and accepted by subadult and adult monkeys, suggestive of robbing/bartering payoff maximization and economic decision-making. This population-specific, prevalent, cross-generational, learned and socially influenced practice may be the first example of a culturally maintained token economy in free-ranging animals. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.
Full text

Main text

Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...

Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds.

References
James D. Paterson (2005). Commensalism and conflict : the human-primate interface
Michael J. Beran (2015). Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior Animal Cognition, 19:109-121. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0916-7
Noëlle Gunst (2010). Development of skilled detection and extraction of embedded prey by wild brown capuchin monkeys (cebus apella apella). Journal of comparative psychology, 124:194-204. DOI: 10.1037/a0017723
Gregory Charles Westergaard (2007). Token mediated tool exchange between tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) Animal Cognition, 10:407-414. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0072-9
Stephen E. G. Lea (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29:161-209. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x06009046
M. Keith Chen (2006). How Basic Are Behavioral Biases? Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior Journal of Political Economy, 114:517-537. DOI: 10.1086/503550
Marie Pelé (2009). Long-tailed macaques display unexpected waiting abilities in exchange tasks Animal Cognition, 13:263-271. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0264-6
Sara Bevacqua (2013). Macaque Monkeys Can Learn Token Values from Human Models through Vicarious Reward PLoS ONE, 8:e59961-e59961. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059961
Elsa Addessi (2007). Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) Animal Cognition, 11:275-282. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6
Francesca De Petrillo (2014). Do tufted capuchin monkeys play the odds? Flexible risk preferences in Sapajus spp. Animal Cognition, 18:119-130. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0783-7
Noëlle Gunst (2013). Development of sexual and socio-sexual behaviours in free-ranging juvenile male Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata Behaviour, 150:1225-1254. DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-00003088
Elsa Addessi (2010). How Social Context, Token Value, and Time Course Affect Token Exchange in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) International Journal of Primatology, 32:83-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-010-9440-4
Marian Stamp Dawkins (1994). Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide Journal of Animal Ecology, 63:746-746. DOI: 10.2307/5248
Lydia M. Hopper (2011). Chimpanzees’ socially maintained food preferences indicate both conservatism and conformity Animal Behaviour, 81:1195-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.002
Jacob Cohen (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46. DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104
V Dufour (2008). Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orang-utans Biology Letters, 5:172-175. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0644
Lydia M. Hopper (2015). Captive chimpanzee foraging in a social setting: a test of problem solving, flexibility, and spatial discounting PeerJ, 3:e833-e833. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.833
T. A. Evans (2012). Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance Animal Cognition, 15:539-548. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0482-1
Elsa Addessi (2007). Do capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ) use tokens as symbols? Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 274:2579-2585. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0726
Michael J. Beran (2011). Numerical judgments by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a token economy. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 37:165-174. DOI: 10.1037/a0021472
Sarah Frances Brosnan (2004). A Concept of Value during Experimental Exchange in Brown Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus apella Folia Primatologica, 75:317-330. DOI: 10.1159/000080209
Sarah Frances Brosnan (2005). Responses to a simple barter task in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes Primates, 46:173-182. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-005-0125-0
Marie Pelé (2009). Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): Species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange. Journal of comparative psychology, 123:375-384. DOI: 10.1037/a0017253
Sarah Frances Brosnan (2004). Socially Learned Preferences for Differentially Rewarded Tokens in the Brown Capuchin Monkey (Cebus apella). Journal of comparative psychology, 118:133-139. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.133
Fany Brotcorne (2017). Intergroup variation in robbing and bartering by long-tailed macaques at Uluwatu Temple (Bali, Indonesia) Primates, 58:505-516. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-017-0611-1
Francesca De Petrillo (2019). Evolutionary origins of money categorization and exchange: an experimental investigation in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) Animal Cognition, 22:169-186. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-018-01233-2
Fany Brotcorne (2019). Social influence on the expression of robbing and bartering behaviours in Balinese long-tailed macaques Animal Cognition, 23:311-326. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-019-01335-5
Elsa Addessi (2019). Are the roots of human economic systems shared with non-human primates? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 109:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.026
Paul Martin (1993). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide Cambridge University Press eBooks DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139168342